1. Al-Hammed, A. and S. Assaf. "A Survey of Cost Reduction Techniques Used by Construction Firms in Saudi Arabia." American Association of Cost Engineers Transactions, 1988.

2. Archibald, R. D., and R. L. Villoría. Network Based Management Systems (PERT/CPM). New York: Wiley, 1967.

3. Ayers, R. H., R. M. Walsh, and R. G. Staples. "Project Management by the Critical Path Method." Research Management, |uly 1970.

Baker, B. N., and R. L. Eris. An Introduction to PERT-CPM. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1964.

5. Benningson, L. A. TREND—New Management Information from Networks. Sandoz Co. Reprint, 1974.

6. Berkwitt, G. W. "Management Rediscovers CPM." Dun's Review, May 1971.

7- Blystone, E. E., and R. G. Odum. "A Case Study of CPM in a Manufacturing Situation." Journal of Industrial Engineering, Nov.-Dec. 1964.

8- Brennan, J. Applications of Critical Path Techniques. New York: Elsevier, 1968.

9. Bubshait, K. A., and W. (. Selen. "Project Characteristics That Influence The Implementation of Project Management Techniques: A Survey. "Project Management tournai, lune 1992.

10. Clark, C. G., D. G. Malcom, ). H. Rosenbloom, and W. Fazar. "Applications of a Technique for Research and Development Program Management." Operations Research, Sept.-Oct. 1959.

11. Davis, E. W. "Networks: Resource Allocation." Industrial Engineering, April 1974.

12. Dean, B. V. Project Management: Methods and Studies. New York: Elsevier, 1985.

13. DeCoster, D. T. "PERT/Cost—The Challenge." Management Services, May-Iune 1964

14. Digman, L. A., and G. I. Green. "A Framework of Evaluating Network Planning and Control Techniques." Research Management, |an. 1981.

15. Evarts, H. E. Introduction to PERT. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1964.

16. Gallagher, C. "A Note on Pert Assumptions." Management Science, October 1987.

17. Gido, |. An Introduction to Project Planning, 2nd ed. Industrial Press, 1986.

18. Golfarb, N., and W. K. Kaiser. Gantt Charts and Statistical Quality Control. New York: Hofstra University Press, 1964.

19. Horowitz, 1. Critical Path Scheduling: Management Control Through CPM and PERT. Melbourne, FL: Krieger, 1980.

20. Jenett, E. "Experience with and Evaluation of Critical Path Methods." Chemical Engineering, Feb. 1969.

21 Karns, L. A., and L. A. Swanson. 'The Effect of Activity Time Variance on Critical Path Scheduling." Project Management Quarterly. Dec. 1973.

22. Kelly, I. E„ and M. R. Walker. "Critical Path Planning and Scheduling." Proceedings. Eastern Joint Computer Conference, 1959.

23. Kerzner, H. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. 2nd ed. New York- Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1989.

24. Kirkpatrick, C. A., and R. C. Levine. Planning and Control with PERT/CPM. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.

25. Levy. F. K., G. L. Thompson, and J. D. Weist. 'The ABC's of the Critical Path Method." Harvard Business Review, Sept-Oct. 1963.

26. Liberatore, M. J„ and G. J. Titus. "The Practice of Management Science in R S- D Project Management." Management Science, Aug. 1983,

27. Littlefield, T. K., Jr., and P. H. Randolph. "An Answer to Sasieni's Question on PERT Times." Management Science, Oct. 1987.

28. Lockyer. K. G. A« Introduction to Critical Path Analysis. Woodstock, NY: Beckman, 1969.

29. Lowe, C. W. Critical Path Analysis by Bar Oiart. London: Business Books, 1966.

30. MacCrimmon, K. R., and C. R. Ryavec. "An Analytical Study of PERT Assumptions." Operations Research, lan-Feb. 1964.

31. Mallon, J. C. 'Verifying Cost and Schedule During Design." Project Management journal, Mar. 1992.

32. Marquis, D. G. "A Project Team Plus PERT= Success. Or Does It?" Innovation, 1969.

33. Martino, R. L. Project Management and Control, Vol. I. New York: American Management Association, 1964.

34. McCahon, C. S. "Using PERT as an Approximation of Fuzzy Project-Network Analysis." IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, May 1993.

35. Meyer, W. C„ J. B. Ritter, and L. R. Shaffer. The Critical PatA Method. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1965.

36. Mills, N. L. "The Development of a University Sports Complex: A Project Management Application." Computers and Industrial Engineering, 17:149-153, 1989.

37. Moder, I. J., C. R. Phillips, and E. W. Davis. Project Management with CPM, PERT, and Precedence Diagramming, 3rd ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1983.

38. Morris, L. N. Critical PatH, Construction and Analysis. Oxford, G.B: Pergamon Press, 1967.

39. Muth, J. F., and G. L. Thompson. Industrial Scheduling. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 1963.

40. Naik, B. Project Management: Scheduling and Monitoring by PERT/CPM. Advent Books, 1984.

41. Orczyk, I. J., and L. Chang. "Parametric Regression Model for Project Scheduling." Project Management journal, Dec. 1991.

42. Pazer, H.H., and L. A. Swanson. PERTsim, Text and Simulation. International Textbook, 1969.

43. Powers, J. R. "A Structured Approach to Schedule Development and Use." Project Management journal, Nov. 1988.

44. Pritsker, A. A. B. "GERT Networks." The Production Engineer, Oct. 1968.

45. Rajthe, A. W., ed. Gantt on Management. New York: American Management Association, 1961.

46. Saitow, A. R. "CSPC: Reporting Project Progress to the Top." Harvard Business Review, lan-Feb. 1969.

47. Santell, M. P., J. R. Jung, and J. C. Warner. "Optimization in Project Coordination Scheduling through Application of Taguchi Methods." Project Management journal, Sept. 1992.

48. Sasieni, M. W. "A Note on PERT Times." Man¿ agement Science, Dec. 1986.

49. Schönberger, R. I. "Why Projects Are Always. Late: A Rationale Based on Manual Simulation of a PERT/CPM Network." Interfaces, Oct. 1981.

50. Silverberg, E. C. "Predicting Project Completion." Research-Technology Management, May-June 1991.

51. Toelle. R. A., and J. Witherspoon. "From 'Managing the Critical Path' to 'Managing Critical Activities."' Project Management journal, Decern^ 1990.

52. Turban, E. "The Line of Balance—A Management by Exception Tool." loumal of Industrial Engineering, Sept. 1968.

53. Vazsonyi, A. "L'Histoire de Grandeur et la Decadence de la Methode PERT." Management Science. April 1979.

54. Weist, I. D. "A Heuristic Model for Scheduling

Large Projects with Limited Resources." Management Science. Feb. 1967.

55. Weist, ). D., and F. K. Levy. A Management Guide to PERT/CPM, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs. N): Prentice Hall. 1977.

56. Woodgate, H. S. Planning by Netuwé. Woodstock, NY: Beckman 1977.


The Sharon Construction Corporation has been awarded a contract for the construction of a 20,000-seat stadium. The construction must start by February 15 and be completed within one year. A penalty clause of $15,000 per week of delay beyond February 15 of next year is written into the contract.

Jim Brown, the president of the company, called a planning meeting. In the meeting he expressed great satisfaction at obtaining the contract and revealed that the company could net as much as $300,000 on the project. He was confident that the project could be completed on time with an allowance made for the usual delays anticipated in such a large project.

Bonnie Green, the director of personnel, agreed that in a normal year only slight delays might develop due to a shortage of labor. However, she reminded the president that for such a large project, the company would have to use unionized employees and that the construction industry labor agreements were to expire on November 30. Past experience indicated a fifty-fifty chance of a strike.

lim Brown agreed that a strike might cause a Problem. Unfortunately, there was no way to change the contract. He inquired about the prospective length °f a strike. Bonnie figured that such a strike would last either eight weeks (70 percent chance) or possibly 12 weeks (30 percent chance).

lim was not too pleased with these prospects. However, before he had a chance to discuss contingency plans he was interrupted by lack White, the Mce"President for engineering, lack commented that m extremely cold December had been predicted. This ,actor had not been taken into consideration during earlier estimates since previous forecasts called for milder weather. Concrete pouring in a cold December would require in one out of every three cases (depending on the temperature) special heating that cost $500 per week.

This additional information did not please lim at all. The chances for delay were mounting. And an overhead expense of $500 per week would be incurred in case of any delay.

The technical details of the project are given in the appendix to this case.

The management team was asked to consider alternatives for coping with the situation. At the end of the week five proposals were submitted.

1. Expedite the pouring of seat gallery supports. This would cost $20,000 and cut the duration of the activity to six weeks.

2. The same as proposal 1, but in addition, put a double shift on the filling of the field. A cost of $10,000 would result in a five-week time reduction.

3. The roof is very important since it precedes several activities. The use of three shifts and some overtime could cut six weeks off the roofing at an additional cost of only $9000.

4. Do nothing special until December 1. Then, if December is indeed cold, defer the pouring of the seat gallery supports until the cold wave breaks, schedule permitting, and heat whenever necessary. If a strike occurs, wait until it is over (no other choice) and then expedite all remaining activities. In that case, the duration of any activity could be cut but to no less than one third of its normal duration. The additional cost per activity for any week which is cut would be $3000. 5. Do not take any special action; that is, hope and pray that no strike and no cold December occur (no cost).

Appendix: Technical Details of the Stadium

The stadium is an indoor structure with a seating capacity of 20,000. The project begins with clearing the site, an activity that lasts eight weeks. Once the site is clear, the work can start simultaneously on the structure itself and on the field.

The work in the field involves subsurface drainage which lasts eight weeks, followed by filling for the playing field and track. Only with the completion of the filling (14 weeks) can the installation of the artifi cial playing turf take place, an activity that consumes 12 weeks.

The work on the structure itself starts with excavation followed by the pouring of concrete footings. Each of these activities takes four weeks. Next comes the pouring of supports for seat galleries (12 weeks), followed by erecting pre-cast galleries (13 weeks). The seats can then be poured (4 weeks) and are ready for painting. However, the painting (3 weeks) cannot begin until the dressing rooms are completed (4 weeks). The dressing rooms can be completed only after the roof is erected (8 weeks). The roof must be erected on a steel structure which takes 4 weeks to install. This activity can start only after the concrete footings are poured.

Once the roof is erected, work can start simultaneously on the lights (5 weeks) and on the scoreboard and other facilities (4 weeks). Assume there are 28 days in February and that February 15 falls on a Monday.


1. Analyze the five proposals and make recommendations based on expected costs.

2. What other basis might be used to make a decision besides expected costs? What then might the decision be?

Was this article helpful?

0 0
Project Management Made Easy

Project Management Made Easy

What you need to know about… Project Management Made Easy! Project management consists of more than just a large building project and can encompass small projects as well. No matter what the size of your project, you need to have some sort of project management. How you manage your project has everything to do with its outcome.

Get My Free Ebook

Post a comment